Are humans instinctively brutal? Do we attend hockey games, boxing matches and race car events hoping see blood? Do we rubberneck at car accidents hoping to see death? Have we really made no moral progress since gladiator games were used as public executions? The producers of Escape Room want us to think so. From The Most Dangerous Game (1932) to The Naked Prey (1965) to The Hunger Games trilogy (2012-15), movies have explored the concept of humans hunting humans and tapped into the idea of execution as entertainment. And that’s what happens in the movie.
Inspired by escape-the-room genre of video games, real-life escape room adventures have become popular over the past decade in cities all over the world. Contestants are locked inside a room decorated to resemble a haunted house, prison cell, space station, or other isolated location and are given a time limit during which to discover clues, solve riddles, and find the escape hatch. It’s a fun, socially interactive, real-life alternative to sitting in front of a computer screen discovering clues, solving riddles, and finding the escape hatch.
The premise of Escape Room is simple: Six strangers are invited to compete for a high-stakes prize if they can successfully solve the puzzle and escape from a series of rooms. Danny (Nik Dodani) is a video-game nerd who has played in nearly a hundred escape rooms before. Zooey (Taylor Russell) is a shy math prodigy with a talent for solving puzzles. Jason (Jay Ellis) is an investment banker with expensive tastes. Ben (Logan Miller) is a stock clerk for a grocery store. Amanda (Deborah Ann Woll) is an army veteran and Mike (Tyler Labine) is a blue-collar worker. What has brought these six together? And how will they interact under pressure?
The six soon realize, of course, that this is no game. If they fail, they die. With its PG-13 rating the movie is high on suspense and low on blood and guts, making it an entertaining film as the audience members work along with the characters to solve the riddles and unlock the doors.
What makes the film interesting are the gradual reveal of the characters’ backgrounds and their interaction with one another as they do what it takes to survive. They soon realize that one person will die in each room. Who will it be? What would you do to make sure it isn’t you? They’re all strangers, after all. They only just met, and they have no personal connection to the others. Will self-interest lead to treachery? Or will goodness win out?
Despite being driven by self-interest, we still seem to want our heroes to be self-sacrificing—at least in Hollywood. We cheered when Han Solo, that maverick businessman of the cosmos, returned to help the resistance in Star Wars. We took heart when Catniss Everdeen refused to kill her youthful opponents in The Hunger Games. We even approved when Hombre (Paul Newman), the ultimate libertarian hero, reluctantly risked his life to rescue the wife of the thieving, racist Bureau of Indian Affairs agent from the stagecoach robbers.
But in reality, when push comes to shove and our own lives are on the line, what would we do to survive?
While driving cross country recently I listened to The Women in the Castle by Jessica Shattuck, a fictionalized account of the widows of Jewish resistance leaders and their experiences during and after the World War II. It’s a sappy, sentimental novel full of 21st century morality and clichés. For example, Shattuck refers to “racial profiling” when her characters are asked to show their papers, a term that did not exist in World War II. Moreover, her protagonist is cloyingly egalitarian. She comes from an aristocratic background and thus has access to special privileges in terms of food and protection. Yet she refuses to accept those special favors, or at least expresses consternation about accepting them. To hell with accuracy; Shattuck seems compelled to embue her 20th century protagonist with 21st century values, no matter what. Such egalitarianism is a fine principle in times of plenty, but when your children are truly starving or threatened by death, you will accept any special opportunity offered to feed and protect them.
Holocaust survivor Victor E. Frankl, author of “Man’s Search for Meaning.”
By contrast, actual holocaust survivor Viktor Frankl belies Shattuck’s politically correct fantasy about genteel survival morality in his concentration camp memoir Man’s Search for Meaning. Frankl describes to a particularly heinous source of survivor’s guilt—he admits that in order to live through the kind of brutal starvation they experienced in the camps, those who survived had to be ruthlessly selfish at times. There might be one piece of potato in the soup pot, and that one piece of potato would determine who had enough sustenance to survive the march to work the next day and who would collapse in the snow. You couldn’t share. There simply wasn’t enough. So you did what you must to scavenge that bite of potato, reach the warm spot at the center of the mass of prisoners, avoid the front of the line when the camp guards were looking for someone to shoot. You might feel guilty. You might be furtive. But you did it anyway.
Hollywood conveniently whitewashes the truth about the survival instinct in films like this in order to celebrate community, sacrifice, and cooperation. The hero manages to be self-sacrificing and self interested, to fall on the grenade and make it out alive. And that’s okay. After all, we’re looking for escapism, not realism, in a movie like Escape Room.
Escape Room directed by Adam Robitel. Original Film Production, Columbia Pictures distribution, 2019, 100 minutes.
Jo Ann Skousen is the founding director of the Anthem Libertarian Film Festival, which meets July 17-20 at Paris Resort Las Vegas as part of FreedomFest, “the world’s largest gathering of free minds.” For information about tickets and submissions, go to www.anthemfilmfestival.com
