Roma is perhaps the most unusual and unexpected Oscar contender for Best Picture of 2018. It’s filmed in black and white, spoken in Spanish with English subtitles, and told with very little storyline, no musical soundtrack and no well known actors. It’s set in the 1970s but feels more like the 1940s or ‘50s. And it moves as slowly as a sloth. The Cannes Film Festival rejected it because it was made for Netflix instead of theatrical release. Yes, an Oscar contender made for Netflix! It was available for free on the Internet before it went into a few art theaters. Nevertheless, like Italy’s Life Is Beautiful (1997), it has been nominated for both Best Foreign Language Film and Best Picture, and at ten apiece it ties The Favourite for Oscar nominations this year.
Unlike Life Is Beautiful, Roma does not have a strong, charismatic protagonist or a compelling conflict. It contains no overt political or social message. It simply presents a dreary year in the dreary life of a young Mexican working girl. Yet it is the most personal film Mexican director Alfonso Cuaron (Gravity, 2013) has ever made, told as a series of vignettes that come directly from Cuaron’s childhood memories and filmed by Cuaron himself. It is dedicated to Libo, a servant in his childhood home on whom the film is based. Cuaron said of the film, “It’s an intimate portrait of the women who raised me in recognition of love as a mystery that transcends space, memory and time.”
A street in Roma where some of the movie was shot
The story centers on Cleo (Yalitza Aparicio), one of two full-time domestic servants working in the home of a middle-class family in Roma, a neighborhood of Mexico City. Cleo and Sofia (Marina de Tavira) share a small room where they also do the ironing after the regular workday is done. They chatter together congenially throughout the day, and the children in the family seem to genuinely love Cleo; one of the boys (perhaps representing Cuaron himself) holds her hand affectionately when she kneels on the floor beside the couch to watch tv with the family after dinner (until the mother absently sends her away to fulfill another duty.)
But while Cleo is the subject of the movie, she is not our POV—we don’t see the story through her eyes. Instead, Cuaron uses wide angles so that we observe her only in her interactions with other people. This technique objectifies her to a large degree. Since we don’t see what she is seeing, we also don’t see any eye contact from others looking at her. Consequently, we can feel sympathy toward her, but it’s difficult to feel true empathy. Cuaron uses this subtle method to tell his audience, “Don’t you dare say, ‘I know how she feels.’” We don’t. At best we can observe what she experiences, and think of how we might have felt ourselves.
So why does this film merit 10 Oscar nominations, and why does director Guillermo del Toro call it one of his top five favorite films of all time? The key is not in the two Best Picture nominations, but in the eight others. First is the cinematography. Cuaron often uses award-winning Mexican cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki to shoot his films, but this time he chose to handle the camera himself in order to keep the film as personal and true to his intent as possible. The result is often dreamy and reflective. Indeed, reflection is a recurring theme throughout the film. It begins with water washing repeatedly over a brick sidewalk, almost like waves, reflecting the sky, the trees, a building, and even an airplane flying across its reflected surface. Reflections are often seen in windows, cabinets, the table Cleo is polishing, the car fender as the man of the house parks in the narrow garage.
Nominations for sound editing and sound mixing are especially impressive considering the lack of music; instead, the sounds are entirely natural–the wash of water against the bricks, the bickering of birds in the trees, the murmer of dogs barking and people conversing in the distance.
And the acting! So natural, so subdued. With very little dialog, Avaricio and de Tavira, nominated for Best Actress and Best Supporting Actress, portray the unspoken thoughts and desires of these two young servants. The hospital scene is particularly poignant. Avaricio is brilliant in her outward restraint and inner passion. The scene was filmed in one take and may have earned her an Oscar by itself.
Nevertheless, the lack of a traditional storyline and a traditional soundtrack makes the film seem slow, even plodding at first. We meet the servants, the family, the dog, but nothing much happens—until Cleo goes to the movies with a friend on her day off and ends up going off with a blind date instead—probably her first date ever. There we begin to see how her past, her class, and her future blend into a kind of inescapable destiny. The vignettes become compelling, and in the end, we can’t stop thinking about this young girl who has had so few choices in her life yet had some truly astounding experiences. We realize that she has had no control over the biggest factor determining her opportunities—the circumstances of her birth—and thus no real control over any aspect of her life, beyond how dedicated she will be as a servant. It’s almost as though she were born dead.
Roma ends mostly as it begins, because Cleo’s life will end mostly as it began. Many important events have occurred during the year, politically and historically as well as within the family, but these events really haven’t affected Cleo’s daily life. She is loved and appreciated by the family members, but she still lives in the small room above the garage that she shares with Sofia. She will never truly belong to this family she serves. In making this film about his beloved nanny Libo, Cuaron gives her a place at last.
Roma directed by Alfonso Cuaron. Netflix, 2018, 135 minutes.
Jo Ann Skousen is the founding director of the Anthem Libertarian Film Festival, which meets July 17-20, 2019, at the Paris Resort in Las Vegas. For information about tickets and submissions go to www.anthemfilmfestival.com
